An edition of Proportion (1999)

Proportion

Philosophy, Science and Architecture

  • 2 Want to read
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 2 Want to read

Buy this book

Last edited by IdentifierBot
August 6, 2010 | History
An edition of Proportion (1999)

Proportion

Philosophy, Science and Architecture

  • 2 Want to read

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Language
English
Pages
388

Buy this book

Edition Availability
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture
2015, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture
2002, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion
2002, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture
2002, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture
2002, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture
2002, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture
2002, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: Philosophy, Science and Architecture
November 2, 1999, Taylor & Francis
in English
Cover of: Proportion
Proportion: science, philosophy, architecture
1999, E & FN Spon, Taylor & Francis
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


First Sentence

"On 18 June 1957 the motion 'that Systems of Proportion make good design easier and bad design more difficult' was defeated, by 60 votes to 48, in a debate at the Royal Institute of British Architects in London."

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL7499673M
ISBN 10
0419227806
ISBN 13
9780419227809
Library Thing
3687290
Goodreads
298249

Excerpts

On 18 June 1957 the motion 'that Systems of Proportion make good design easier and bad design more difficult' was defeated, by 60 votes to 48, in a debate at the Royal Institute of British Architects in London.
added anonymously.

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
August 6, 2010 Edited by IdentifierBot added LibraryThing ID
April 24, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Fixed duplicate goodreads IDs.
April 16, 2010 Edited by bgimpertBot Added goodreads ID.
April 14, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Linked existing covers to the edition.
April 29, 2008 Created by an anonymous user Imported from amazon.com record